…why? same shape and colour, just a boring version of the old
threalseymourskinnersays
Why?
Bunskysays
I’m not sure I can on board with this, the old one was really tacky.
BastiWMsays
What the fuck. It wasn’t even derelict or small. I can’t…
rushboy99says
I don’t like it but It looks like they went from seven floors to less than six. Probably making the forced air, electric, plumbing all enclosed, updated and legal .
I looked up a little about it and There seems to be a lot of talk that the front is a facade added in the 80s? Anyone able to confirm.
sujihikisays
so they made a low poly version of the original building?
tbh: i like the new one better
Winston3Dsays
Hold on a minute. The old building doesn’t really look old at all, and the rear facade, which is actually historic, is retained in the new construction. Rear facade on Google maps.
mickeyspouse says
…why? same shape and colour, just a boring version of the old
threalseymourskinner says
Why?
Bunsky says
I’m not sure I can on board with this, the old one was really tacky.
BastiWM says
What the fuck. It wasn’t even derelict or small. I can’t…
rushboy99 says
I don’t like it but It looks like they went from seven floors to less than six. Probably making the forced air, electric, plumbing all enclosed, updated and legal .
I looked up a little about it and There seems to be a lot of talk that the front is a facade added in the 80s? Anyone able to confirm.
sujihiki says
so they made a low poly version of the original building?
tbh: i like the new one better
Winston3D says
Hold on a minute. The old building doesn’t really look old at all, and the rear facade, which is actually historic, is retained in the new construction. Rear facade on Google maps.
thepioneeringlemming says
bearing in mind the "old" building was constructed in the 1980’s…
BarbedWireFloss says
Unlike many posts on this sub I think the new one in this case is actually quite tasteful